Posted on

cannabis seed investors

This site is operated by SeedInvest Technology, LLC (“SeedInvest”), which is not a registered broker-dealer. SeedInvest does not give investment advice, endorsement, analysis or recommendations with respect to any securities. All securities listed here are being offered by, and all information included on this site is the responsibility of, the applicable issuer of such securities. SeedInvest has not taken any steps to verify the adequacy, accuracy or completeness of any information. Neither SeedInvest nor any of its officers, directors, agents and employees makes any warranty, express or implied, of any kind whatsoever related to the adequacy, accuracy or completeness of any information on this site or the use of information on this site. By accessing this site and any pages thereof, you agree to be bound by the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.

All securities-related activity is conducted by SI Securities, LLC (“SI Securities”), an affiliate of SeedInvest, and a registered broker-dealer, and member FINRA/SIPC, located at 61 Broadway, Suite 1705, New York, NY 10006, and/or North Capital Private Securities Corporation (“NCPS”), an unaffiliated entity, and a registered broker-dealer, and member FINRA/SIPC, located at 2825 E Cottonwood Pkwy, Salt Lake City, Utah 84121. SI Securities and/or NCPS does not make investment recommendations and no communication, through this website or in any other medium should be construed as a recommendation for any security offered on or off this investment platform. Equity crowdfunding investments in private placements, regulation A offerings and start-up investments in particular are speculative and involve a high degree of risk and those investors who cannot afford to lose their entire investment should not invest in start-ups. Companies seeking startup investments through equity crowdfunding tend to be in earlier stages of development and their business model, products and services may not yet be fully developed, operational or tested in the public marketplace. There is no guarantee that the stated valuation and other terms are accurate or in agreement with the market or industry valuations. Additionally, investors may receive illiquid and/or restricted stock that may be subject to holding period requirements and/or liquidity concerns. In the most sensible investment strategy for start-up investing, start-ups should only be part of your overall investment portfolio. Further, the start-up portion of your portfolio may include a balanced portfolio of different start-ups. Investments in startups are highly illiquid and those investors who cannot hold an investment for the long term (at least 5-7 years) should not invest.

The second half of 2019 saw a punishing devaluation of the publicly traded cannabis companies with drops of 60% or more after failures to meet performance expectations 1 . I hadn’t predicted it, but I had listened intently at the various canna-business conferences in 2018 and early 2019 as alternate predictions were made that the days of early stage and emerging cannabis companies were coming to an end 2 – they simply wouldn’t be able to survive the cash power and marketing prowess of the large players – and nodded my head I didn’t believe it. I understood the thinking: at the time multi-national tobacco and beer companies had recently made multi-billion dollar commitments in the industry 3 , and publicly traded companies were using their stock price to acquire across categories of the sector from seed to sale. So the predictions of demise for early stage companies seemed well reasoned. Still, I wasn’t onboard. Experience has taught me entrepreneurs, and their small and emerging companies, are the lifeblood of almost every business sector for the simple reason that bigger companies rarely innovate 4 . They’re too busy making what’s currently selling, while small companies have to innovate to compete.

$36.7 – $44.7 billion in 2019, and projected

As I said at the top, small companies are where innovation happens. In cannabis, whether it is meaningful applications in health and wellness, new genetics in flower, or the next generation inhalation device, it’s happening at companies that need to raise early rounds. Also as stated earlier, valuations have met reality, which means a lower cost basis, equating to greater potential returns. Lastly, the legacy of the industry, a hardscrabble history, has trained its entrepreneurs to withstand crisis. The operators know running a cannabis business can be hard, and aren’t surprised by a finicky crop, or a nonsensical licensing requirement, or just about anything – they’ve seen it. What they are is innovative and resilient, big words for smart and tough. I find some of them well worth betting on.

The unknowns are which existing CPG players will enter the space and who will win. Beyond the beer (Constellation Brands) and tobacco (Altria Group and Imperial Brands) companies already in, big pharma, beauty, and supplements have all signaled interest. On a more immediate basis, while it’s easy to identify the publicly traded cannabis companies and MSOs in trouble, it’s more difficult to identify which of the current leaders are ultimately going to be the winning consolidators. Given these unknowns for the top players, I like early stage and emerging companies for investment, where their immediate future is more predictable, and the potential exists for creating traditional CPG value towards acquisition.

Before getting to the company sizes that capture my attention in cannabis because they have a dedicated singular focus (they have to), these are my assumptions about the cannabis marketplace, which are generally held by the industry at large.